
This is the table of contents of a finished content model audit, where every section is a deliverable, not a meeting. Tick each deliverable you want in scope, whether you are briefing a supplier, checking a proposal against it, or structuring an audit you run yourself. The count at the side updates as you go, and the export is the scope you hand over.

The six sections below run in the order the audit runs them: the inventory and taxonomy come from the administration interface, the usage analysis and workflow observations come from the published content and the person who publishes, and the recommendations and the repair or rebuild position are built on the four sections before them. Ticking everything describes the full audit. Leaving a section unticked is a scoping decision, and it is worth writing down why.
Fill it in below. Your result updates as you go.
Every type and template the system offers, against how many published items actually use it and when it was last used.
Every tag and category with its usage count, and the merge and retire decisions that leave editors one list to work from.
What the published content shows about which parts of the model are real and which are theoretical.
Sit with the person who publishes most and watch one article go out. Every field they skip, every value they copy and every step they do outside the system is a note about the model.
What can change now without development, what to build next and in what order, and what the audit could not settle.
The answer in one sentence with the evidence behind it, so the document works as a brief for whoever does the work.
Bring an administrator login and the person who publishes most. We do not need access to the code to start, and the audit document is yours whatever you decide afterwards.
Align the business case, governance and first implementation—without starting a large programme.